Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A17 Pro vs Huawei Kirin 8000

Apple A17 Pro
62.7Inno Score
VS
H
—Inno Score
62.7CPU30.7
47.8GPU—
64.2Benchmarks—
72AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 8000

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro

  • Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 31
  • 57% lower process: 3 nm vs 7 nm
  • 57% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
Announced20232023
Process3 nm+57%7 nm
TDP (typical)8 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.6—

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz
Max clock3.78 GHz+57%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
GPUApple GPU (6-core)—

AI

AI comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
NPU16-core Neural Engine—
AI performance35 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
Memory typeLPDDR5-6400—
Max bandwidth51.2 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X70)—

Media

Media comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Huawei Kirin 8000
SpecApple A17 ProHuawei Kirin 8000
AnTuTu1,450,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,950Top 9%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)7,250Top 14%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,600Top 26%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup