Huawei Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
30.7CPU30.3
—GPU25.1
—Benchmarks51.8
20Efficiencyspec-based76.2
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 7300
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7300
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 5 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Arm Mali-G615 MC2 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | MediaTek APU 655 |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 51.2 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | — | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 884,953Bottom 41% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 319,814Bottom 41% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 126,561Bottom 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 156,376Bottom 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 282,202Bottom 48% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,030Top 49% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 2,930Top 46% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 830Bottom 27% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025VSMediaTek Dimensity 7300vs Google TensorVSMediaTek Dimensity 7300vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSMediaTek Dimensity 7300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 7300vs Samsung Exynos 1330VS