Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Unisoc T765

Huawei Kirin 8000
30.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Unisoc T765
30.9Inno Score
28.9CPU24.5
26.2GPU25.7
46.6Benchmarks—
20Efficiencyspec-based36
4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80001 spec wins — Unisoc T765

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Huawei Kirin 8000 scores 30.6 against 30.9 for Unisoc T765. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

  • Stronger CPU score: 29 vs 25
  • 212% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 955 vs 306
  • 39% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,678 vs 1,925
  • 35% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 993 vs 736

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765

  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc T765
Announced20232023
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc T765
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+4%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc T765
GPU—Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc T765
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc T765
Modem—Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL)
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc T765
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc T765
AnTuTu720,605Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)275,622Bottom 24%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)95,326Bottom 26%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)153,530Bottom 31%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)196,127Bottom 20%—
AnTuTu 12799,448Bottom 25%—
Geekbench 6 (single)993+35%Bottom 44%736Bottom 27%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,678+39%Bottom 45%1,925Bottom 27%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme955+212%Top 47%306Bottom 22%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup