Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
28.9CPU24.4
26.2GPU20
46.6Benchmarks36
20Efficiencyspec-based54.9
9 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80002 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Huawei Kirin 8000 scores 30.6 against 30.8 for Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
- Stronger CPU score: 29 vs 24
- Stronger GPU score: 26 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 47 vs 36
- 602% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 955 vs 136
- 223% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 95,326 vs 29,548
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
- 17% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm+14% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 5 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Qualcomm Adreno 610 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Snapdragon X11 LTE |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 90Hz |
| Video capture | — | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 720,605+53%Bottom 21% | 471,425Bottom 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 275,622+49%Bottom 24% | 185,372Bottom 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 95,326+223%Bottom 26% | 29,548Bottom 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 153,530+19%Bottom 31% | 128,755Bottom 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 196,127+54%Bottom 20% | 127,750Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 12 | 799,448+103%Bottom 25% | 393,462Bottom 4% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 993+108%Bottom 45% | 477Bottom 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,678+73%Bottom 45% | 1,544Bottom 19% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 955+602%Top 47% | 136Bottom 10% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Samsung Exynos 1610VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Unisoc Tiger T820VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VS

