Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

WINNER
Huawei Kirin 8000
30.6Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 1610
30.5Inno Score
28.9CPU27.3
26.2GPU21.5
46.6Benchmarks—
20Efficiencyspec-based52
3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80002 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Huawei Kirin 8000 scores 30.6 against 30.5 for Samsung Exynos 1610. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Huawei Kirin 8000 edges ahead in GPU and CPU, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

  • Stronger GPU score: 26 vs 22
  • 149% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 955 vs 384
  • 25% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,678 vs 2,144

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20232026
Process7 nm5 nm+29%

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz2 + 6
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 1610
GPU—Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory type—LPDDR4X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 1610
Modem—4G LTE
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.3

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 1610
Video capture—4K@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu720,605Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)275,622Bottom 24%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)95,326Bottom 26%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)153,530Bottom 31%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)196,127Bottom 20%—
AnTuTu 12799,448Bottom 25%—
Geekbench 6 (single)993+4%Bottom 45%953Bottom 40%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,678+25%Bottom 45%2,144Bottom 36%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme955+149%Top 47%384Bottom 34%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup