Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 1610
24.4CPU27.3
20GPU21.5
36Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based52
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6855 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 scores 30.8 against 30.5 for Samsung Exynos 1610. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
- 17% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
- 182% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 384 vs 136
- 100% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 953 vs 477
- 39% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,144 vs 1,544
- 17% lower process: 5 nm vs 6 nm
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm+17% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR4X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X11 LTE | 4G LTE |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 90Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 471,425Bottom 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 185,372Bottom 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 29,548Bottom 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 128,755Bottom 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 127,750Bottom 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 12 | 393,462Bottom 4% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 477Bottom 19% | 953+100%Bottom 40% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,544Bottom 19% | 2,144+39%Bottom 36% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 136Bottom 10% | 384+182%Bottom 34% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Unisoc Tiger T820VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Huawei Kirin 8000VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 8000VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782GVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VS