Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 7100
33.1Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
29.5CPU30.7
24GPU—
47.7Benchmarks—
36Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 71001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7100 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7100Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20252026
Process6 nm—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7100 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7100Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7100 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7100Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G610 MC2Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7100 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7100Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5-5500 / LPDDR4X-4266—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7100 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7100Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16)—
Max download3.3 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7100 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7100Samsung Exynos 1610
Max display1200x2600 @ 120Hz—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7100 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7100Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu750,153Bottom 24%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)307,696Bottom 31%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)85,426Bottom 18%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)147,214Bottom 18%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)209,817Bottom 18%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,001Bottom 46%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,914Top 50%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme695Bottom 10%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup