Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2200
62.7CPU39.3
47.8GPU35.5
64.2Benchmarks57.3
72AI—
79.6Efficiency66.5
8 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+23) and efficiency (+13). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 57
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 67
- 84% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 1,600
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+35% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+32%Top 20% | 1,100,000Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+84%Top 8% | 1,600Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+75%Top 12% | 4,150Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600+71%Top 27% | 2,100Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

