Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
62.7CPU49.9
47.8GPU47.8
64.2Benchmarks66.7
72AI—
79.6Efficiency66.5
5 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 55.8, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+13) and CPU (+13). Samsung Exynos 2400e still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 50
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 67
- 44% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 2,050
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
- 22% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 10% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,600,000 vs 1,450,000
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+22% | 3.1 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000 | 1,600,000+10% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+44% | 2,050 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+13% | 6,400 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600 | 3,600 |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VS