Apple A17 Pro vs Unisoc Tiger T820
62.7CPU27
47.8GPU—
64.2Benchmarks35.9
72AI—
79.6Efficiency52.5
6 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro2 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+36) and benchmarks (+28). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 53
- 328% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 690
- 222% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,250 vs 2,250
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 6 W+25% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+40% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+199% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+209%Top 20% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+328%Top 8% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+222%Top 12% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 27% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS