Apple A18 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
68.4CPU39.3
50.6GPU35.5
67.5Benchmarks57.3
72AI—
82.1Efficiency66.5
8 spec wins — Apple A181 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A18 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.2 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+29) and efficiency (+16). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A18
- Stronger CPU score: 68 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 51 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 68 vs 57
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 67
- 103% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,250 vs 1,600
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.04 GHz performance + 4x2.2 GHz efficiency | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 4.04 GHz+44% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (16-core) | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X70 5G (external) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Super Retina XDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A18 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,650,000+50%Top 16% | 1,100,000Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,250+103%Top 6% | 1,600Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,050+94%Top 10% | 4,150Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,950+88%Top 20% | 2,100Top 51% |
