Apple A18 vs Unisoc Tiger T820
68.4CPU27
50.6GPU—
67.5Benchmarks35.9
72AI—
82.1Efficiency52.5
7 spec wins — Apple A182 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A18 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.2 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+41) and benchmarks (+32). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A18
- Stronger CPU score: 68 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 68 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 53
- 371% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,250 vs 690
- 258% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,050 vs 2,250
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 6 W+14% |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.04 GHz performance + 4x2.2 GHz efficiency | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 4.04 GHz+50% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (16-core) | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-6400 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s+251% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X70 5G (external) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Super Retina XDR | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,650,000+251%Top 16% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,250+371%Top 6% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,050+258%Top 10% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,950Top 20% | — |