Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A19 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Apple A19 Pro
73.5Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
77.4CPU30.7
64.9GPU—
74.7Benchmarks—
72AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Apple A19 Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A19 Pro

  • Stronger CPU score: 77 vs 31
  • 78% higher Max clock: 4.26 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20252026
Process3 nm—
TDP (typical)8 W—
ArchitectureArmv9.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x4.26 GHz + 4x2.6 GHz2 + 6
Max clock4.26 GHz+78%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUApple GPU (6-core, Neural Accelerators)Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
NPU16-core Neural Engine—
AI performance35 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5X-9600—
Max bandwidth76.8 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X80)—
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.3

Media

Media comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Video capture4K@120fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A19 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A19 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu2,200,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)3,800Top 5%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,500Top 7%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,700Top 13%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup