Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
36.6CPU38.7
36.2GPU40.8
48.6Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
58.3Efficiencyspec-based68
2 spec wins — Google Tensor G26 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1680 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 50.2 to 42.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+14) and GPU (+5). Google Tensor G2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger GPU score: 41 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 63 vs 49
- 75% higher AnTuTu: 1,363,464 vs 780,000
- 42% higher GPU clock: 1,200 MHz vs 848 MHz
- 28% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,411 vs 3,450
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2026 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz | 2.9 GHz+2% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | 1,200 MHz+42% |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | — | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 780,000 | 1,363,464+75% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430+4%Top 33% | 1,376Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,450Top 40% | 4,411+28%Top 31% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800+3%Bottom 43% | 1,742Bottom 42% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS

