MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
42.2CPU38.7
39.2GPU40.8
65.5Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
73.8Efficiencyspec-based68
6 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 83001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.8 to 50.2, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+4) and benchmarks (+3). Samsung Exynos 1680 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8300
- Stronger CPU score: 42 vs 39
- 46% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,546 vs 1,742
- 16% higher Max clock: 3.35 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz+16% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 780 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 19.6 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps+1% | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,524,125Top 39% | 1,363,464 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 439,015Top 47% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 422,306Top 40% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 298,333Top 29% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 364,471Top 42% | — |
| AnTuTu 12 | 1,639,118+9%Top 34% | 1,510,056Top 40% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,432+4%Top 32% | 1,376Top 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,663+6%Top 25% | 4,411Top 29% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,546+46%Top 23% | 1,742Top 30% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8300vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Samsung Exynos 1580VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Huawei Kirin 9030 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G3VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Huawei Kirin T93 ProVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Huawei Kirin 9030 ProVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

