Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
36.6CPU39.3
36.2GPU35.5
48.6Benchmarks57.3
58.3Efficiency66.5
2 spec wins — Google Tensor G25 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 42.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+9) and efficiency (+8). Google Tensor G2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 58
- 41% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 780,000
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 20% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,150 vs 3,450
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz+2% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 780,000Top 44% | 1,100,000+41%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430Top 30% | 1,600+12%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,450Top 35% | 4,150+20%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Top 57% | 2,100+17%Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

