Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

G
51.4Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
45.1CPU30.7
43.1GPU—
56.1Benchmarks—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Google Tensor G41 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4

  • Stronger CPU score: 45 vs 31
  • 29% higher Max clock: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20242026
Process4 nm—
TDP (typical)7 W—
ArchitectureArmv9.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A5202 + 6
Max clock3.1 GHz+29%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G715 MC7Mali-G68
GPU clock940 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
NPUGoogle Edge TPU—

Memory

Memory comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5X—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemExternal (Samsung Exynos 5400)—
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.3

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu1,050,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,950Top 24%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,700Top 28%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,600Top 45%—

Related comparisons

Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS

Try another matchup