Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
45.1CPU39.3
43.1GPU35.5
56.1Benchmarks57.3
71.4Efficiency66.5
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G41 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.4 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+8) and CPU (+6). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger CPU score: 45 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 43 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 67
- 24% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,600 vs 2,100
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2022 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+11% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000Top 29% | 1,100,000+5%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950+22%Top 21% | 1,600Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700+13%Top 24% | 4,150Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600+24%Top 42% | 2,100Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

