Google Tensor G5 vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
55CPU32
45.7GPU31.3
60.5Benchmarks46.6
82.1Efficiency34.5
8 spec wins — Google Tensor G50 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+48) and CPU (+23). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 46 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 35
- 158% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,350 vs 1,300
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+57% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+44% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | — | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+74%Top 25% | 720,000Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+119%Top 12% | 1,050Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+88%Top 18% | 3,300Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350+158%Top 33% | 1,300Top 68% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS

