Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
55CPU28
45.7GPU—
60.5Benchmarks—
82.1Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Google Tensor G50 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 28
- 70% lower process: 3 nm vs 10 nm
- 64% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2018 |
| Process | 3 nm+70% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+64% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | — | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,250,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300Top 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200Top 19% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 31% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS

