Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
63.3CPU37.1
53.8GPU34.2
72.3Benchmarks47.5
—AIspec-based64
84Efficiencyspec-based55.9
7 spec wins — Google Tensor G61 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 44, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+26) and benchmarks (+25). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 48
- 128% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,420 vs 1,500
- 112% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,535 vs 3,550
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- 14% higher cores: 8 vs 7
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2021 |
| Process | 3 nm+40% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 8+14% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+41% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz+51% | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,994,033 | 746,547Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 252,025Bottom 16% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 127,819Bottom 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 144,909Bottom 16% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 221,794Bottom 26% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+90%Top 12% | 1,430Top 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535+112%Top 13% | 3,550Top 39% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420+128%Top 33% | 1,500Bottom 38% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

