Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 850
63.3CPU20
53.8GPU—
72.3Benchmarks20
84Efficiencyspec-based46.7
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G61 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 850
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+52) and CPU (+43). Samsung Exynos 850 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 20
- 1502% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,724 vs 170
- 1156% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,535 vs 600
- 1008% higher AnTuTu: 1,994,033 vs 180,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 850
- 14% higher cores: 8 vs 7
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2020 |
| Process | 3 nm+62% | 8 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 4 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 8+14% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+105% | 2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G52 MP1 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 12.8 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,994,033+1008% | 180,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+1502%Top 13% | 170Bottom 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535+1156%Top 14% | 600Bottom 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420Top 34% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 850vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSSamsung Exynos 850vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS

