Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
63.3CPU21.6
53.8GPU—
72.3Benchmarks20
84Efficiencyspec-based44.2
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G61 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+52) and CPU (+42). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 20
- 827% higher AnTuTu: 1,994,033 vs 215,000
- 678% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,724 vs 350
- 503% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,535 vs 1,250
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 14% higher cores: 8 vs 7
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2019 |
| Process | 3 nm+70% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 5 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 8+14% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+78% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,994,033+827% | 215,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+678%Top 13% | 350Bottom 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535+503%Top 14% | 1,250Bottom 10% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420Top 34% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS

