Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2200
34.9CPU39.3
35.5GPU35.5
45.2Benchmarks57.3
58.3Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Google Tensor6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+12) and efficiency (+8). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 35
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 45
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 58
- 62% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 680,000
- 32% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,150 vs 3,150
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000Top 49% | 1,100,000+62%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 34% | 1,600+19%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 42% | 4,150+32%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | 2,100+24%Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

