Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor
34.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Exynos 2500
66Inno Score
28.4CPU57.9
31GPU54
31.2Benchmarks73.1
0AI85.9
58.3Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Google Tensor8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+86) and benchmarks (+42). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500

  • Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 28
  • Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 31
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 31
  • Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 58
  • 216% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 680,000

General

General comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
Announced20212025
Process5 nm3 nm+40%
TDP (typical)8 W8 W
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv9.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
Cores810+25%
Core configuration2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A551x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
Max clock2.8 GHz3.3 GHz+18%

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
GPUArm Mali-G78 MP20Samsung Xclipse 950
GPU clock848 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
NPUGoogle Edge TPUSamsung NPU
AI performance—59 TOPS

Memory

Memory comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR5X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
ModemExternal (Samsung Exynos 5123)Integrated Exynos 5G modem

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
Video capture4K@60fps8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 2500
AnTuTu 10680,0002,150,000+216%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,3402,300+72%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,1508,200+160%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,7004,400+159%

Related comparisons

Google Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Google Tensor G2VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

Try another matchup