Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2500
34.9CPU57.2
35.5GPU54.3
45.2Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
58.3Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Google Tensor8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+29) and CPU (+22). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 35
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 45
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 58
- 216% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 680,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2025 |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm+40% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+18% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000Top 49% | 2,150,000+216%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 34% | 2,300+72%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 42% | 8,200+160%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | 4,400+159%Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

