Huawei Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
30.7CPU45.9
—GPU46.1
—Benchmarks71.7
20Efficiencyspec-based73.8
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 8400
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 31
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 35% higher Max clock: 3.25 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 6 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.25 GHz+35% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | MediaTek NPU 880 |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 68.3 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated 5G modem |
| Max download | — | 5.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,946,644Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 560,176Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 642,040Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 339,619Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 404,809Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,450Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,400Top 17% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,400Top 30% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VS