Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
30.7CPU33.7
—GPU28.2
—Benchmarks54.8
20Efficiencyspec-based73.8
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1480
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1480
- Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 31
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 15% higher Max clock: 2.75 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 6 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.75 GHz+15% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | — | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 997,950Bottom 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 353,082Bottom 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 224,206Top 50% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 162,521Bottom 39% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 258,141Bottom 41% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,150Top 40% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 3,400Top 39% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,200Bottom 38% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Google Tensor G2VS