Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
30.7CPU37.1
—GPU34.2
—Benchmarks47.5
—AIspec-based64
20Efficiencyspec-based55.9
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80002 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 31
- 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 21% higher Max clock: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2021 |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm+29% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz+21% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 746,547Bottom 22% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 252,025Bottom 15% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 127,819Bottom 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 144,909Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 221,794Bottom 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,430Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 3,550Top 37% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,500Bottom 47% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS