Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Unisoc Tiger T606

H
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc Tiger T606
26.2Inno Score
30.7CPU20
—Benchmarks20
20Efficiencyspec-based46.7
3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80000 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T606

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 20
  • 50% higher Max clock: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • 42% lower process: 7 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T606

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc Tiger T606
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc Tiger T606
Announced20232021
Process7 nm+42%12 nm
TDP (typical)—4 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc Tiger T606
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc Tiger T606
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+50%1.6 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc Tiger T606
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc Tiger T606
GPU—Arm Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc Tiger T606
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc Tiger T606
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth—14.9 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc Tiger T606
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc Tiger T606
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc Tiger T606
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc Tiger T606
Max display—FHD+ @ 60Hz
Video capture—1080p@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Unisoc Tiger T606
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Unisoc Tiger T606
AnTuTu—235,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—390Bottom 10%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,400Bottom 13%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup