Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Samsung Exynos 2500
24.9CPU57.9
26.1GPU54
33.3Benchmarks73.1
0AI85.9
34.5Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S9 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 28.7, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+86) and efficiency (+45). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 25
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 35
- 238% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 1,300
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm+57% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 8 W+11% |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 3.3 GHz+26% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000 | 2,150,000+199% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050 | 2,300+119% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300 | 8,200+148% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300 | 4,400+238% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

