Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Samsung Exynos 2500
32CPU57.2
31.3GPU54.3
46.6Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
34.5Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S9 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+45) and benchmarks (+28). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 35
- 238% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 1,300
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm+57% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 8 W+11% |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 3.3 GHz+26% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000Top 46% | 2,150,000+199%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050Top 44% | 2,300+119%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 38% | 8,200+148%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300Top 68% | 4,400+238%Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

