Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Unisoc T7250
32CPU20
31.3GPU55
46.6Benchmarks—
34.5Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S2 spec wins — Unisoc T7250
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7250 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- Stronger CPU score: 32 vs 20
- 46% higher Max clock: 2.62 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 42% lower process: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7250
- Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 31
- 13% higher GPU clock: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2024 |
| Process | 7 nm+42% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz+46% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Arm Mali-G57 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | 850 MHz+13% |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 720,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050Top 48% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 42% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300Bottom 36% | — |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc T7250vs MediaTek Helio G81VSUnisoc T7250vs MediaTek Helio G91VSUnisoc T7250vs MediaTek Helio G100VSUnisoc T7250vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VS