Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Unisoc T765
32CPU24.5
31.3GPU55
46.6Benchmarks—
34.5Efficiencyspec-based36
3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S2 spec wins — Unisoc T765
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- Stronger CPU score: 32 vs 25
- 71% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,300 vs 1,925
- 43% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,050 vs 736
- 14% higher Max clock: 2.62 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765
- Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 31
- 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm
- 13% higher GPU clock: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm+14% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz+14% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | 850 MHz+13% |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 720,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050+43%Top 46% | 736Bottom 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300+71%Top 40% | 1,925Bottom 27% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300Bottom 44% | — |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7060VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 8020VSUnisoc T765vs Samsung Exynos 1330VSUnisoc T765vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VSUnisoc T765vs Samsung Exynos 1380VSUnisoc T765vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS