Huawei Kirin 9010 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
36.2CPU72.6
33.2GPU77.4
—Benchmarks81.1
20Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90106 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+44) and CPU (+36). Huawei Kirin 9010 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9010
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 36
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 33
- 360% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,573
- 141% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 4,484
- 107% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 1,446
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 7 nm | 2 nm+71% |
| Architecture | ARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510) | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.3 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.18 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510 Little | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.3 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9010 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 2,827,538Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,446Top 32% | 2,995+107%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,484Top 31% | 10,824+141%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,573Bottom 40% | 7,230+360%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9010vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GVSHuawei Kirin 9010vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GVSHuawei Kirin 9010vs MediaTek Helio G99VSHuawei Kirin 9010vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS
