Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9010 vs Unisoc T7300

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
36.2CPU25.3
33.2GPU65
20Efficiencyspec-based36
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90103 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9010

  • Stronger CPU score: 36 vs 25

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

  • Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 33
  • 27% higher GPU clock: 950 MHz vs 750 MHz
  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T7300
Announced20242025
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.3 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.18 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510 Little2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz+5%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T7300
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock750 MHz950 MHz+27%

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T7300
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T7300
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.25.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T7300
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T7300
Geekbench 6 (single)1,446Top 32%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,484Top 31%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,573Bottom 40%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup