Huawei Kirin 9030 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
40CPU38.7
—GPU40.8
—Benchmarks62.7
66.9AIspec-based56.5
52Efficiencyspec-based68
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90303 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9030 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9030
- 48% higher AI performance: 29 TOPS vs 20 TOPS
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| Architecture | ARM (ARMv8, Taishan V124 cores) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.75 GHz Taishan V124 Big + 3x2.27 GHz Taishan V124 Mid + 4x1.72 GHz Taishan V124 Tiny | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.75 GHz | 2.9 GHz+5% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 935A | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Ascend NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 29 TOPS+48% | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | — | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | — | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,363,464 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,376Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 4,411Top 31% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,742Bottom 42% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9030vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9030vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9030vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSHuawei Kirin 9030vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS
