Huawei Kirin 9030 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
40CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
—Benchmarks81.1
66.9AIspec-based—
52Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90303 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9030 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9030
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 40
- 60% lower process: 2 nm vs 5 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 5 nm | 2 nm+60% |
| Architecture | ARM (ARMv8, Taishan V124 cores) | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.75 GHz Taishan V124 Big + 3x2.27 GHz Taishan V124 Mid + 4x1.72 GHz Taishan V124 Tiny | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.75 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 935A | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Ascend NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 29 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9030 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 2,827,538Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,995Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 10,824Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 8% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9030vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9030vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9030vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSHuawei Kirin 9030vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS