Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300

H
—Inno Score
VS
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
41.3Inno Score
—CPU30.3
—GPU25.1
—Benchmarks51.8
—Efficiencyspec-based76.2
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
Announced20262024
Process—4 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
Cores—8
Core configuration—4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—2.5 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
GPU—Arm Mali-G615 MC2

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
NPU—MediaTek APU 655

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
Memory type—LPDDR5-6400
Max bandwidth—51.2 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
Modem—Integrated 5G modem
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth6.05.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus MediaTek Dimensity 7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProMediaTek Dimensity 7300
AnTuTu—884,953Bottom 36%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—319,814Bottom 36%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—126,561Bottom 28%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—156,376Bottom 28%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—282,202Bottom 44%
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,030Top 50%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,930Top 48%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—830Bottom 16%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup