Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2600

H
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
—CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
—Benchmarks81.1
—Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2600
Announced20262026
Process—2 nm
Architecture—Armv9.3

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2600
Cores—10
Core configuration—1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2600
GPU—Samsung Xclipse 960

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2600
NPU—Samsung NPU

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2600
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth6.0—

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2600
Video capture4K—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu—2,827,538Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—947,776Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,052,625Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—347,409Top 23%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—479,728Top 25%
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,995Top 9%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,824Top 5%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,230Top 7%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup