Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

H
—Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
30.8Inno Score
—CPU25.5
—GPU21.3
—Benchmarks32.5
—Efficiencyspec-based54.9
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
Announced20262021
Process—6 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
Cores—8
Core configuration—2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
GPU—Adreno 619

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
NPU—Hexagon NPU

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
Memory type—LPDDR4X-4266
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
Modem—Snapdragon X51 5G
Max download—2.5 Gbps
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.1

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 695
AnTuTu—411,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—906Bottom 38%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,013Bottom 32%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—360Bottom 4%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup