Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G

H
—Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
31.5Inno Score
—CPU24.6
—Benchmarks32.5
—Efficiencyspec-based44.2
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Announced20262020
Process—8 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Cores—8
Core configuration—2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
GPU—Qualcomm Adreno 618 (overclocked)

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
NPU—Qualcomm Hexagon 688

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth—14.9 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Modem—Snapdragon X15 LTE
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.1

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 732G
AnTuTu—410,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—740Bottom 30%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,950Bottom 28%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup