Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2100

H
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2100
44Inno Score
—CPU37.1
—GPU34.2
—Benchmarks47.5
—AIspec-based64
—Efficiencyspec-based55.9
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
Announced20262021
Process—5 nm
TDP (typical)—9 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
Cores—8
Core configuration—1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—2.9 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
GPU—Arm Mali-G78 MP14
GPU clock—854 MHz

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
NPU—Samsung NPU
AI performance—26 TOPS

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
Memory type—LPDDR5

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
Modem—Integrated Exynos 5G modem
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth6.0—

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
Video capture4K8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2100
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2100
AnTuTu—746,547Bottom 22%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—252,025Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—127,819Bottom 30%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—144,909Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—221,794Bottom 25%
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,430Top 33%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—3,550Top 39%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,500Bottom 35%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup