Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 9611

H
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 9611
26.3Inno Score
—CPU21.6
—Benchmarks20
—Efficiencyspec-based44.2
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 9611
Announced20262019
Process—10 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 9611
Cores—8
Core configuration—4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53
Max clock—2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 9611
GPU—Arm Mali-G72 MP3

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 9611
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth—14.9 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 9611
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-12
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 9611
Max display—FHD+ @ 60Hz
Video capture4K4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 9611
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 9611
AnTuTu—215,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—350Bottom 11%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,250Bottom 10%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup