Huawei Kirin 980 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
24.8CPU39.3
—GPU35.5
33.7Benchmarks57.3
37Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9806 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 30.3, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+30) and benchmarks (+24). Huawei Kirin 980 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 980
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 34
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 37
- 191% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 550
- 156% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 430,000
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2022 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 + 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz+8% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MP10 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Dual NPU (Da Vinci predecessor) | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-21 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 430,000Top 68% | 1,100,000+156%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 550Top 78% | 1,600+191%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,000Top 68% | 4,150+108%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,100Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845VSHuawei Kirin 980vs MediaTek Dimensity 700VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
