Huawei Kirin 980 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
24.8CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
33.7Benchmarks81.1
37Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9805 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 30.3, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+48) and benchmarks (+47). Huawei Kirin 980 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 980
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 34
- 445% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 550
- 441% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 2,000
- 71% lower process: 2 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2026 |
| Process | 7 nm | 2 nm+71% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 + 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.6 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MP10 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Dual NPU (Da Vinci predecessor) | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-21 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 980 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 430,000 | 2,827,538Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 550Bottom 21% | 2,995+445%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,000Bottom 31% | 10,824+441%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 8% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845VSHuawei Kirin 980vs MediaTek Dimensity 700VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

