Huawei Kirin T90A vs Samsung Exynos 2500
34.4CPU57.2
28.4GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
—Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 31.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+26) and CPU (+23). Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 28
- 257% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 1,233
- 106% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 3,987
- 87% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 1,229
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025 |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | ARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin T90A | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 2,150,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,229Top 37% | 2,300+87%Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,987Top 33% | 8,200+106%Top 10% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,233Bottom 39% | 4,400+257%Top 18% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin T90Avs Huawei Kirin 9010VSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GVSHuawei Kirin T90Avs MediaTek Helio G99VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS
