Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T92A vs Unisoc T7225

Huawei Kirin T92A
37.8Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7225
—Inno Score
40CPU20
28GPU22.1
60Benchmarks—
20Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T92A0 spec wins — Unisoc T7225

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7225 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T92A

  • Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 20
  • Stronger GPU score: 28 vs 22
  • 895% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,184 vs 119
  • 42% lower process: 7 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T7225
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T7225
Announced20252025
Process7 nm+42%12 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T7225
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T7225
Cores88
Core configuration—2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T7225
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T7225
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920Arm Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock—650 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T7225
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T7225
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1600

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T7225
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T7225
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.2

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T7225
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T7225
Max display—FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz
Video capture—1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T7225
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T7225
AnTuTu1,225,220Top 48%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)474,825Top 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)205,592Top 48%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)276,082Top 37%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)268,721Bottom 50%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,517Top 26%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,812Top 22%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,184+895%Bottom 46%119Bottom 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup