Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
33.3Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
23.9CPU30.7
31.2Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 6100+2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 24

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6100+Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20232026
Process6 nm—
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6100+Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.2 GHz2.4 GHz+9%

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6100+Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6100+Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133—
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6100+Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6100+Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 120Hz—
Video capture2K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6100+Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu390,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)730Bottom 27%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,900Bottom 24%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup