MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ vs Samsung Exynos 2600
23.9CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
31.2Benchmarks81.1
54.9Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 6100+5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 33.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+50) and CPU (+49). MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 24
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 31
- 470% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 1,900
- 310% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 730
- 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 2 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.2 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 390,000 | 2,827,538Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 730Bottom 27% | 2,995+310%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,900Bottom 24% | 10,824+470%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 8% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+vs Unisoc Tiger T760VSMediaTek Dimensity 6100+vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSMediaTek Dimensity 6100+vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSMediaTek Dimensity 6100+vs Apple A12 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

