MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
26.3CPU57.2
21.3GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
36Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 64006 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 26.6, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+33) and CPU (+31). MediaTek Dimensity 6400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6400
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 26
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 21
- 1136% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 356
- 302% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 2,041
- 190% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 792
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2025 |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 3.3 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 2,150,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 792Bottom 34% | 2,300+190%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,041Bottom 32% | 8,200+302%Top 11% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 356Bottom 6% | 4,400+1136%Top 19% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 6400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835VSMediaTek Dimensity 6400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675VSMediaTek Dimensity 6400vs MediaTek Helio G35VSMediaTek Dimensity 6400vs MediaTek Helio P35VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS

