Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 7020
37.6Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
25.9CPU30.7
42Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 70202 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7020

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 26

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7020 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7020Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20232026
Process6 nm—
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7020 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7020Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.2 GHz2.4 GHz+9%

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7020 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7020Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7020 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7020Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5-3200—
Max bandwidth25.6 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7020 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7020Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7020 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7020Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 120Hz—
Video capture2K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 7020 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 7020Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu600,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)910Bottom 39%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,150Bottom 36%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup